LifeStrategy® funds and model portfolios
Five choices for low-cost, uncomplicated all-in-one access to global equity and bond markets, available in funds and model portfolios, meaning more time for advisers to spend with their clients.
"Correlation matters – but maybe not as much as most investors would believe"
Head of Asset Allocation, Vanguard, Europe
The dreaded scenario came to pass in 2022 for the 60/40 model as both equities and bonds experienced negative returns in the same year for the first time since 19771.
This is in sharp contrast with other periods when the equity component of the 60/40 portfolio suffered – like in the early 2000s or early 1990s, when the loss on equities was at least partially offset by the total return on bonds2. In other words, the 60/40 model has typically helped multi-asset investors ride out difficult markets thanks to the negative return correlation between stocks and bonds.
The catalyst for last year’s negative returns and positive correlation between equity and bond markets was the sharp tightening of monetary policy by central banks to combat persistently high inflation, against a backdrop of low economic growth. That’s because rising rates pull bond prices down and tighter monetary conditions tend to be a headwind for companies’ real earnings, meaning equity prices also fall.
So, with inflation proving sticky, which may necessitate further rate hikes, there’s concern that an environment of higher inflation and positive correlation is here to stay. In particular, investors may be concerned that persistently higher correlations will mean that bonds will provide less diversification going forward and that the concept of a 60/40 portfolio needs to be revisited.
In our 2023 mid-year economic and market outlook, we predict that inflation will come down globally over the next 12 months or so and that the long-term negative return correlation between equities and bonds will reassert itself. But what if it didn’t?
In this article we explore what it would mean for multi-asset investors if equity and bond returns were to remain positively correlated.
Return correlation between asset classes is an important component of portfolio construction and the lower the correlation, the stronger the diversification benefit. That applies at the level of single securities as well as across asset classes for multi-asset portfolios.
More precisely, correlation provides an estimate of how two variables, in our case returns on equities and bonds, are related. When correlation is negative it means that, on average, bond returns increase when equity returns decrease, and vice versa.
However, the importance of negative correlation for diversification benefits is sometimes overemphasised. The chart below plots two efficient frontiers, illustrating the best possible return for the lowest possible risk for six different mixes of equities and bonds – ranging from 100% bonds to 100% equities. The first frontier – in purple – is constructed using the average correlation between equities and bonds from 2000 to 2021, which was -7%. The 60/40 portfolio here has an expected return of 6.3% and a volatility of 9.4%.
Then, keeping all else equal, we construct the same frontier but this time we assume a much higher and positive return correlation of 33%, which is the average level of correlation between equities and bonds in the 1990s. Even in a positive correlation regime, an investor in a 60/40-style portfolio would only need to shift their allocation marginally to 62% equities to achieve a similar outcome, with an annualised return of 6% and volatility of 10.1%.
Best risk/return frontiers under different global equity/bond correlation regimes
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
Source: Bloomberg. Notes: Data are monthly total returns in USD from 1 November 2000 to 31 December 2021. Global equities are represented by the MSCI ACWI Index. Global bonds are represented by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index Value (USD Hedged). For the period, the observed correlation between equities and bonds was -7%. The correlation coefficient of +33% was estimated using the same indices between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1999.
While average returns are lower in the positive correlation regime relative to the negative correlation regime, the difference in return outcomes is probably less significant than many investors might expect.
The key message here is that correlation matters – but maybe not as much as most investors would believe. It’s also worth noting that bonds’ diversification properties still work even when fixed income is positively correlated to equities3.
Vanguard economists in the US ran simulations for two portfolios in two different environments, as illustrated in the graphic below. One portfolio consisted of 60% global stocks and 40% global bonds. The other had a 10% allocation to commodities at the expense of the equivalent share of the equity portion and an 8% allocation to intermediate-term treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) in the bond portion.
One of the two environments represented our baseline, using Vanguard’s current projections for broad asset class returns, inflation and return correlations over the next 10 years. The other envisioned a future with higher inflation and higher correlations (in many cases, a positive correlation instead of a negative one).
Source: Vanguard, as of 31 May 2023. Notes: The traditional 60/40 portfolio is a mix of 36% US equities, 24% non-US equities, 28% US investment-grade taxable bonds and 12% non-US bonds. The inflation-hedged portfolio is a mix of 30% US equities, 20% non-US equities, 10% commodities, 22% US investment-grade taxable bonds, 8% US TIPS and 10% non-US bonds. The following indices were used as proxies for each asset class: MSCI US Broad Market Index for US equities, MSCI All-Country ex USA Index for non-US equities, Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index for US bonds, Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index for non-US bonds, Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities Index for TIPS and Bloomberg Commodity Index for commodities.
IMPORTANT: The projections or other information generated by the Vanguard Capital Markets Model regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. Distribution of return outcomes from the VCMM are derived from 10,000 simulations for each modelled asset class. Simulations are as of 31 May 2023. Results from the model may vary with each use and over time. For more information, please see the Notes section below.
Portfolios in the higher-inflation, higher-correlation scenario had higher volatility and worse potential declines than the baseline scenario. That was true for both the traditional global 60/40 portfolio and the one that included commodities and TIPS. The latter portfolio did have somewhat less volatility than the traditional 60/40 portfolios, alleviating downside risk in particular.
What is remarkable is how similar the range of potential outcomes over 10 years are across both portfolios and both scenarios. It reinforces our view that asset allocation—not inflation or correlation—is the main determinant of long-term returns.
1, 2 Source: Bloomberg. Note: Annual total returns calculated in USD from 1977 to 2022. For equities, we use US equities represented by the MSCI USA Index from 1977 to 1987 and global equities afterwards, represented by the MSCI ACWI Index. For bonds, we use US bonds represented by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index from 1977 to 1990 and global bonds afterwards, represented by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index Value (USD Hedged).
3 Source: Bloomberg. Data between 1 January 1990 to 30 April 2023. Notes: Analysis of global stock and bond returns when global equities have fallen at least 10% from the previous maximum. Global equities are represented by the MSCI ACWI Index. Global bonds are represented by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index Value (USD Hedged). Data shows that even during equity downturns when the monthly correlation between equity and bond returns was positive, global bonds tended to provide diversification with positive returns. Returns are calculated in USD.
The value of investments, and the income from them, may fall or rise and investors may get back less than they invested.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
Any projections should be regarded as hypothetical in nature and do not reflect or guarantee future results.
Performance may be calculated in a currency that differs from the base currency of the fund. As a result, returns may decrease or increase due to currency fluctuations.
Funds investing in fixed interest securities carry the risk of default on repayment and erosion of the capital value of your investment and the level of income may fluctuate. Movements in interest rates are likely to affect the capital value of fixed interest securities. Corporate bonds may provide higher yields but as such may carry greater credit risk increasing the risk of default on repayment and erosion of the capital value of your investment. The level of income may fluctuate and movements in interest rates are likely to affect the capital value of bonds.
IMPORTANT: The projections and other information generated by the Vanguard Capital Markets Model regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. VCMM results will vary with each use and over time.
The VCMM projections are based on a statistical analysis of historical data. Future returns may behave differently from the historical patterns captured in the VCMM. More important, the VCMM may be underestimating extreme negative scenarios unobserved in the historical period on which the model estimation is based.
The Vanguard Capital Markets Model® is a proprietary financial simulation tool developed and maintained by Vanguard’s primary investment research and advice teams. The model forecasts distributions of future returns for a wide array of broad asset classes. Those asset classes include US and international equity markets, several maturities of the U.S. Treasury and corporate fixed income markets, international fixed income markets, U.S. money markets, commodities, and certain alternative investment strategies. The theoretical and empirical foundation for the Vanguard Capital Markets Model is that the returns of various asset classes reflect the compensation investors require for bearing different types of systematic risk (beta). At the core of the model are estimates of the dynamic statistical relationship between risk factors and asset returns, obtained from statistical analysis based on available monthly financial and economic data from as early as 1960. Using a system of estimated equations, the model then applies a Monte Carlo simulation method to project the estimated interrelationships among risk factors and asset classes as well as uncertainty and randomness over time. The model generates a large set of simulated outcomes for each asset class over several time horizons. Forecasts are obtained by computing measures of central tendency in these simulations. Results produced by the tool will vary with each use and over time.
For professional investors only (as defined under the MiFID II Directive) investing for their own account (including management companies (fund of funds) and professional clients investing on behalf of their discretionary clients). In Switzerland for professional investors only. Not to be distributed to the public.
The information contained in this article is not to be regarded as an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so. The information in this article does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. You must not, therefore, rely on the content of this article when making any investment decisions.
Issued in EEA by Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited which is regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland.
Issued in Switzerland by Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH.
Issued by Vanguard Asset Management, Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.
© 2023 Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited. All rights reserved.
© 2023 Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH. All rights reserved.
© 2023 Vanguard Asset Management, Limited. All rights reserved.