By Kevin DiCiurcio, CFA, head of the Vanguard Capital Markets Model® research team

Inflation is on the rise in many parts of the world, and that means interest rates likely will be too. Financial asset pricing models suggest that inflation can influence stocks and bonds similarly, resulting from a shared relationship with short-term interest rates. Therefore, some investors have begun to wonder: Will stock and bond returns start to move in tandem and, if so, what could that mean for diversification in a balanced portfolio?

To answer these questions, my colleagues and I have identified the factors that have historically driven stock and bond co-movements over time and have published our findings in The stock/bond correlation: Increasing amid inflation, but not a regime change.

Chief among those drivers is inflation, and we found that it would take considerably more inflation than we’re expecting for stocks and bonds to move together to a degree that would diminish the diversifying power of bonds in a balanced portfolio1.

Why long-term investors maintain a balanced portfolio

It’s important to understand why so many investors hold a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds.

Stocks serve as a portfolio’s growth engine, the source of stronger expected returns in the majority of market environments. If they always outperformed bonds or otherwise had assured outcomes, however, investors would have little incentive to also hold bonds.

Although stock prices historically have risen over time, their trajectory hasn’t been straight. They’ve endured a lot of bumps – and several sharp contractions – along the way.

That’s where bonds come in. Bonds typically have acted as ballast for a portfolio, with prices rising – or falling less sharply – during periods when stock prices are falling.

That contrasting return pattern helps minimise losses to a portfolio’s value compared with an all-stock portfolio. It helps investors adhere to a well-considered plan in a challenging return environment.

Correlations in context: Time matters

We use the term correlation to explain how stock and bond returns move in relation to one another. When returns generally move in the same direction, they are positively correlated; when they move in different directions, they are negatively correlated.

The combination of negatively correlated assets will enhance diversification by smoothing the fluctuations in portfolio asset values through time. Lately, however, stock and bond returns have moved more frequently in the same direction and have, at times, even been positively correlated.

But these positive correlations have happened for relatively brief periods. And, as it turns out, time matters.

Short-term trends can vary; long-term positive or negative correlations can last decades

Line chart showing Rolling correlation from 1992 until 2020 with the Y-axis having a ratio range of -1 to 1 (in increments of 0.2), Average correlation is noted as -0.32 to 0.42.The first line show 60-day rolling correlation and the second shows 24-month rolling correlation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Sources: Vanguard, based on data from Refinitiv from January 1, 1990, through July 26, 2021. Data appear on chart only at the start of 1992 to reflect the end of the first 24-month rolling correlation2.

As with any investment performance, looking solely at short periods will tell you only so much. Since 2000, stock/bond correlations have spiked into positive territory on numerous occasions. Correlations over the longer term, however, remained negative, and we expect this pattern to persist.

How much inflation would it take?

Our research identified the primary factors that have influenced stock and bond correlations from 1950 until today. Of these, long-term inflation has by far been the most important.

Because inflation moves stock and bond returns in the same direction, the question becomes: How much inflation would it take to move return correlations from negative to positive?

The answer is a lot.

By our numbers, it would take an average 10-year rolling inflation of 3.5%. This is not an annual inflation rate; it’s an average over 10 years. For context, to reach a 3% 10-year average any time soon – say, in the next five years – we would need to maintain an annual core inflation rate of 5.7%.

In contrast, we expect core inflation in 2022 to be about 2.6%, which would move the 10-year trailing average to just 1.8%.

The US Federal Reserve, in its efforts to ensure price stability, targets 2% average annual inflation, much like the Bank of England and European Central Bank, but far beneath the threshold that we believe would cause positive correlations of any meaningful duration.

It’s also well below inflation rates in the pre-2000 era, which from 1950 to 1999 averaged 5.3% and were associated with positive long-term stock/bond correlations.

Positive correlations require high inflation

Four line chart showing 24-month rolling stock/bond correlation annually from 2021 until 2025 with the Y-axis having a ratio range of -0.5 to 0.5 (in increments of 0.1).The four lines show: Average 10-year trailing inflation (3.5%);  Average 10-year trailing inflation (3%); Average 10-year trailing inflation (2.5%); Average 10-year trailing inflation (2%, baseline).

Any projections should be regarded as hypothetical in nature and do not reflect or guarantee future results.

Note: The figure shows Vanguard’s projections for stock-bond correlations under four scenarios for 10-year inflation from April 2021 through December 2025. Source: Vanguard.

Asset allocation, more than correlation, influences portfolio outcomes

What does this mean for the traditional 60% stock/40% bond portfolio?

For investors who feel an itch to adjust their portfolios in preparation for a reversal in stock/bond correlations, we would say, “Not so fast.” In the portfolio simulation environment that we tested, positive versus negative correlations affected measures of fluctuations in portfolio values, such as volatility and maximum drawdown, through time but had little impact on the range of long-term portfolio outcomes.

What’s more, we found that shifting a portfolio’s asset allocation toward stocks – to 80% from 60% – led to a more prominent change in the portfolio’s risk profile than did the portfolio’s remaining 60/40 during a correlation regime change.

This aligns with something you may have heard us say before: Portfolio outcomes are primarily determined by investors’ strategic asset allocations. And this is good news because, with proper planning, investors with balanced portfolios should be well-positioned to stay on course to meet their goals, instead of swerving to avoid bumps in the road.

 

To read the paper, The stock/bond correlation: Increasing amid inflation, but not a regime change, click here.

1 Wu, Boyu (Daniel), Ph.D., Beatrice Yeo, CFA, Kevin J. DiCiurcio, CFA, and Qian Wang, Ph.D., 2021. The Stock-Bond Correlation: Increasing Amid Inflation, but Not a Regime Change. Valley Forge, Pa.: The Vanguard Group, Inc.

2 Long-term stock/bond correlations were largely positive during much of the 1990s but have mostly been negative since about 2000. It is not uncommon for the correlation to turn positive over the shorter term, but this has not altered the longer-term negative relationship.

Investment risk information

The value of investments, and the income from them, may fall or rise and investors may get back less than they invested.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Any projections should be regarded as hypothetical in nature and do not reflect or guarantee future results.

Funds investing in fixed interest securities carry the risk of default on repayment and erosion of the capital value of your investment and the level of income may fluctuate. Movements in interest rates are likely to affect the capital value of fixed interest securities. Corporate bonds may provide higher yields but as such may carry greater credit risk increasing the risk of default on repayment and erosion of the capital value of your investment. The level of income may fluctuate and movements in interest rates are likely to affect the capital value of bonds.

Important information

For professional investors only (as defined under the MiFID II Directive) investing for their own account (including management companies (fund of funds) and professional clients investing on behalf of their discretionary clients). In Switzerland for professional investors only. Not to be distributed to the public.

The information contained in this document is not to be regarded as an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so. The information in this document does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. You must not, therefore, rely on the content of this document when making any investment decisions.

Issued in EEA by Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited which is regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland.

Issued in Switzerland by Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH.

Issued by Vanguard Asset Management, Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.

© 2021 Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited. All rights reserved.

© 2021 Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH. All rights reserved.

© 2021 Vanguard Asset Management, Limited. All rights reserved.

907