Technology: An adversary in the fight for 2% inflation
18 October 2017 | Joe Davis
In many countries, inflation remains lower than policymakers would like, even amidst declining unemployment. Globalisation, China's economic performance, slow growth and "transitory factors" such as cheaper mobile phone plans help explain stubbornly low inflation. But they're not the whole story.
Technology is another important – and often overlooked – challenge that central banks face in sustainably meeting their inflation targets. Vanguard's calculations reveal that technology's role in producing United States GDP is increasing exponentially. And technology's reach extends well beyond Silicon Valley. In 1997, US workers used $0.08 worth of technology to make $1 of real GDP (see chart below). Today they use $0.20, and that number is rising. Increasingly, the US Federal Reserve is going toe-to-toe with Moore's Law.
Moore's Law: A drag on inflation
Coined by Intel cofounder Gordon Moore, Moore's Law has become shorthand for the diffusion of ever more powerful and cheaper technologies. We see it in consumer electronics – the smartphone that is twice as powerful and half as expensive as the one you replace, or the new TV that is flatter, sharper and cheaper than last year's model. These well-known, direct effects drag down measures of inflation for those products.
But Moore's Law is about more than smartphones, TVs and Amazon Prime. Its knock-on effects restrain the need for higher prices in every corner of the economy, not just in high-tech products. Prices are a mark-up over marginal costs, and in an increasingly digitised world, that marginal cost inches closer to zero. That's the story told by our analysis of detailed industry data from the US Bureau of Labour Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The growing reach of Moore's Law: Technology's increasing role
Note: Data cover January 1997 through December 2015. Sources: Vanguard calculations, based on US Bureau of Economic Analysis input-output tables and data from Thomson Reuters Datastream.
To quantify how the increased utilisation of technology is making it harder today to achieve 2% inflation, we identify the technology inputs used by each industry, from recreation and food services to law firms and utilities. We then compare the actual change in prices charged by each industry's products and services (its Producer Price Index) with the change in a hypothetical index that excludes computer-based technology inputs.
The difference is striking. Since 2001, the declining prices of computer and electronic products, computer design and services, and other technology inputs have trimmed 0.5 percentage point per year from the prices that US companies need to actually charge. If Moore's Law didn't exist, in other words, annualised inflation would have been 0.5 percentage point higher. Without Moore's Law, core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) inflation would already be at 2%, and the Fed's inflation target would have been achieved years ago. Interest rates would be higher.
Impact on industry
The impact has been most pronounced in technology-intensive industries such as professional services and manufacturing. Moore's Law helps explain how investment managers can now help clients diversify across global equity and bond markets at ever-lower expense ratios. It's key to the longer-range, lower-cost electric cars rolling off assembly lines in Silicon Valley and Detroit. And it helps explain the slowing rates of inflation in the service fields of education, financial services and retailing.
The low-inflation debate
There's little sign that Moore's Law has seriously entered the Fed's debate about why its "medium-term" 2% inflation target keeps slipping further into the future. Moore's Law deserves a seat at the table in the low-inflation debate. It provides a more complete and accurate picture of the forces that will shape monetary policy and inflation expectations in the years ahead. And it bolsters Vanguard's long-held view that tighter labour markets are less likely to set off the kind of inflation rates that they did before Moore's Law was in full effect.
We live in a digital world that makes 2% inflation harder to achieve. The longer that inflation fails to reach its target, the more some will question whether such a target is ever attainable. The answer is a resounding "yes", of course, for the Fed and any other credible central bank resolved to achieve 2% inflation. But to ensure a more convincing victory in their fight for 2% inflation, policymakers need to better appreciate this new technological challenger in the ring.
This material is directed at professional investors and should not be distributed to, or relied upon by, retail investors. This material is designed for use by, and is directed only at, persons resident in the UK.
This material was produced by The Vanguard Group, Inc. It is for educational purposes only and is not a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell investments.
The value of investments, and the income from them, may fall or rise and investors may get back less than they invested.
The opinions expressed in this material are those of the individual author and may not be representative of Vanguard Asset Management, Limited.
Any projections should be regarded as hypothetical in nature and do not reflect or guarantee future results.
Issued by Vanguard Asset Management, Limited, which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.