Inflation prospects amid the coronavirus pandemic

28 May 2020 | Markets and Economy


 Remove  Save

Commentary by Andrew Patterson, Vanguard senior economist

Amid the challenges brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic and the stringent measures taken to contain it, inflation concerns are surfacing. This is understandable, given potential disruptions to the supply of a range of goods and given the trillions of government stimulus being employed to stabilise global economies.

For now, though, the greater likelihood is disinflation—a slowing in the rate of inflation. The data underlying a 0.4% decline in April in the US core consumer price index, the largest monthly drop on record, hinted at what we could see in the months ahead. Vanguard expects that, in the near term, the effects of diminished demand will outweigh upward pressures on inflation given increased unemployment and consumers’ general reluctance to spend. But eventually, any lingering impact on supply chains, a sizable government debt overhang and central banks willing to tolerate somewhat higher inflation could win out and push prices higher.

Unlocking lockdowns

The question now being posed to governments around the world is how and when to reopen their economies without spurring second waves of infection. The answer will inform when economic recovery can begin to take hold, the depths from which economies must return, and when prices might start to rise toward or above central bank targets that are typically at or just below 2%.

This is all contingent, of course, on health outcomes. Any progress made would be tempered by another uptick in cases of the coronavirus. This may well be a two-steps-forward, one-step-back approach for some time. We can hope it is more like three or four steps forward before any step back.

Weighed against that unknown, consider these observations about the prospects for inflation in our current context:

This isn’t a 1970s supply shock. Arab nations’ oil embargo of several primarily Western nations famously played a role in the double-digit inflation of the 1970s, as wages spiralled higher amid expectations for ever higher prices. Supply disruptions related to the pandemic, on the other hand, are likely to affect a broader array of goods but are set against a different backdrop. Weaker demand could counter the inflationary effect of reduced supply. Although inflationary pressures could arise if demand returns before supply does, we can’t say with certainty when consumers may be ready to spend as they did before the crisis or when suppliers may be able to resume normal operations.

Central banks have upside credibility. Central banks, particularly the US Federal Reserve (Fed), have learned valuable lessons since the 1970s about fighting high inflation and, in doing so, have built up credibility that helps maintain reasonable inflation expectations. The Fed’s dual mandate is price stability and maximum sustainable employment. Most other central banks have price stability as their sole mandate, so they’ll be even more focused on inflation.

Central bank credibility and capabilities play a big role. The period since the global financial crisis has shown that central banks can credibly keep inflation from rising precipitously even in a period of strong fiscal support, high debt levels and large central bank balance sheets. That said, given that most central banks have fallen short of their targets in recent years, they are likely to tolerate above-target inflation—not 1970s-style double-digit inflation, but inflation reasonably above 2% for a time. And should it start breaking higher, they would have the ability and tools (such as raising policy rates) to combat it. In recent years—and, we would expect, for the rest of this year—it’s on the downside where they’ve struggled, as interest rates have fallen towards or below zero even as the banks have implemented extraordinary measures to try to bring inflation to more reasonable levels. It’s just one more reason we’re more concerned for now with disinflation rather than high inflation.

As for leading indicators, we’ll be paying close attention to the prices that producers must pay for their raw materials. As those prices go up, because of either increased demand or supply-chain issues, consumer prices are likely to follow. The figure below considers the relationship between US consumer and producer prices.

Effects of Covid-19 are pushing prices down—for now

The figure plots the change in the core US consumer price index—consumer prices minus the impact of volatile food and energy prices—relative to a principal component measure (a statistical technique that extracts a common signal from the data) of producer price surveys.

Sources: Vanguard analysis of data, as of 30 April 2020, from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics; the Federal Reserve Banks of Dallas, Philadelphia, Kansas City, Richmond and New York; and the Institute for Supply Management.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. 

As the figure shows, producer prices have been falling despite recent Covid-19 supply-chain issues. We expect consumer prices, at least in the near term, to follow a similar trend.

The global policy efforts of the last few months have been unprecedented, appropriately so given the unprecedented nature of the challenges that the global economy and health officials face. When the immediate challenge is over, getting central bank balance sheets and fiscal budgets back toward normal will take some doing and may involve somewhat higher-than-target inflation. With more information about the trajectory of recovery, we’ll shape our longer-term view. But as the experience of the global financial crisis shows, 1970s-style runaway inflation need not be part of it.

Investment risk information:

The value of investments, and the income from them, may fall or rise and investors may get back less than they invested.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Any projections should be regarded as hypothetical in nature and do not reflect or guarantee future results.

Other important information:

For professional investors only (as defined under the MiFID II Directive) investing for their own account (including management companies (fund of funds) and professional clients investing on behalf of their discretionary clients). Not to be distributed to the public. In Switzerland, for professional investors only.

This document is published by Vanguard Asset Management, Limited, based on research conducted by Vanguard Group Inc. It is for educational purposes only and is not a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell investments. It should be noted that it is written in the context of the US market and contains data and analysis specific to the US.

The material contained in this article is not to be regarded as an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so.  The information in this article does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. You must not, therefore, rely on the content of this article when making any investment decisions.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of individual speakers and may not be representative of Vanguard Asset Management, Limited.

Issued by Vanguard Asset Management, Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. Issued by Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH.

© 2020 Vanguard Asset Management, Limited. All rights reserved.

© 2020 Vanguard Investments Switzerland GmbH. All rights reserved.


 Remove  Save